Showing posts with label AERIAL REFUELING. Show all posts
Showing posts with label AERIAL REFUELING. Show all posts

Friday, 20 November 2015

ALTERNATIVES TO THE F-35 FOR CANADA



During the recent federal election Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau announced that his party would scrap the F-35 program should they form the government. At that time the Liberals promised that, if elected, they would launch an "open and transparent competition" to buy more affordable planes to replace Canada's CF-18 jets. Trudeau said the money saved by scrapping the F-35 procurement would go primarily to increasing spending on the Royal Canadian Navy. At the same time the Liberal leader indicated that he believed that the primary mission of our fighter aircraft is the defence of North America.

In the aftermath of the Liberals election triumph, even in the light of recent events in Paris, there is no reason to suppose that they will not follow through on these promises. The decision to try to find a more affordable alternative to the F-35, and spend any savings on the Navy, is a perfectly reasonable one in that it implies an attempt to set priorities and spend accordingly.

Richard Aboulafia, the well regarded Teal group analyst has been quoted as saying that
"It was form fitting function — it's not about if it's a good fighter, but, rather, if this is a role Canada should have," Aboulafia noted that "The F-35 is the perfect plane if Canada is going to be part of coalition warfare. If they just want something that provides air protection for sovereignty, something else fits just fine”.

The fact is that coalition warfare is important to Canada; it could even be argued that it is the Canadian way of war. However, it is not necessary for Canada to procure the F-35 to be able to be a part of future coalitions. In fact providing “kinetic” effects, which can be defined as “killing people whose deaths we believe will advance our goals”, is not the only way in which Canada is currently contributing to the military intervention against the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant.

Operation Impact is the name of Canada's contribution to the military intervention against the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. Joint Task Force-Iraq currently consists of approximately 600 CAF personnel who provide planning and liaison personnel to work with the U.S. and other coalition partners as well as command and control, logistics and an air task force. That Air Task Force includes six CF-18 Hornet fighter aircraft, one CC-150T Polaris aerial refueler to support coalition air operations and two CP-140M Aurora surveillance aircraft to contribute to coalition intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance capabilities.
  
Clearly there are other assets, beyond the provision of F-35’s, that Canada could acquire which would be valuable to potential coalition partners as well as being of use to Canada in purely national terms.

One way in which Canada can contribute to coalition engagements with assets that are also appropriate to National defence that does not involve purchasing F-35s would include the provision of increased ISTAR capabilities. ISTAR is the ability to link information, surveillance, target acquisition, and reconnaissance together to assist a combat force in employing its sensors and managing the information they gather. Some of these attributes are currently being provided by CP-140M Auroras.

Saab recently announced an order for two Airborne Early Warning aircraft from the United Arab Emirates. The Swing Role Surveillance System (SRSR) will incorporate the company’s Erieye radar and other sensors aboard two Bombardier Global 600 business jet platforms.  Saab promises air-to-air, air-to-ground and air-to-sea modes and functionality on the new system, which will become part of its product portfolio and will be made available to other potential customers.

The use of Bombardier platforms could make this system of particular interest to Canada. This is not the only use of a nationally produced aircraft used in a sophisticated sensor role. In the UK the RAF operates the Sentinel, an airborne battlefield and ground surveillance aircraft based on the Bombardier Global Express ultra long range business jet.

In RAF service Sentinel can be used for domestic tasks, for example a Sentinel was used to map the scale of flooding in Southern England during a national emergency. As a national asset it supported the British Army in Afghanistan. For coalition service Sentinel is interoperable with other allied systems such as JSTARS and the NATO Alliance Ground Surveillance (AGS) system. Its role above Libya in 2011 was described as "pivotal" by the head of the RAF. Sentinels were even used to assist in the search for the 223 schoolgirls abducted by the Islamic militant group, Boko Haram in Nigeria.

Another high value capability perennially found to be lacking in coalition activities is aerial refueling.  Canada currently uses the Airbus CC-150 Polaris as its primary air-to-air refueling tanker. Two of the five CC-150s have been converted to air-to-air refueling tankers for the CF-18 fleet as CC-150Ts. 

The RCAF also uses converted C-130s, RCAF designation CC-130H(T), for tactical air-to-air refueling but these platforms are  limited when deploying CF-18s overseas which is better suited by a Strategic air-to-air refueling platform such as the CC-150Ts.

The conversion of the Polaris aircraft was part of a Multi Role Tanker Transport (MRTT) program, initiated because of a German Air Force requirement, which provided a cost effective solution for the Canadian Forces. It would be relatively simple for Canada to take advantage of the existing technology to convert more, or all, of our aircraft to the same standard to provide enhanced capabilities for our own forces as well as those of allies.

It has even been suggested that a purely national solution is available for at least part of the aerial refueling role. Bombardier CSeries aircraft could economically form the basis for a Theater Support Tanker/Transport capability which could support operations of a more regional nature. The ability to operate all across North America, that is to say having sufficient range to operate from Canadian airfields to the Arctic, the Caribbean, as well as from Pacific to Atlantic would insure that it is a capability that could be used abroad as well as domestically.

The simplest way for Canada to procure cheaper air defence assets and at the same time retain a useful capability to bring to the coalition ‘table’  would be to field a force of E/A-18G Growlers, the electronic attack variant of the Super Hornet. Growlers would increase operability and survivability in contested environments and would be compatible with a purchase of new Super Hornets to meet the continental air defence requirement

This is the route chosen by the Australian Air Force.  At a cost of $1.5 billion the Australian EA-18G Growler purchase includes the aircraft, required mission and support systems, training, and ongoing support to effectively develop and operate a Growler capability. Defence plans to achieve Initial Operational Capability (IOC) in 2018.

The 12 EA-18G Growlers will be based at RAAF Base Amberley and will operate in conjunction with air, land and sea forces with the capability to reduce the risk to their forces and improve situational awareness.

It is true that the Australians plan to operate F-35’s as well as Growlers, but there is no question that these aircraft will be capable of providing, by themselves, electronic warfare support by disrupting, deceiving or denying a broad range of military electronic systems, including radars and communications. As well, the Australian Forces believe that the aircraft will be able to support the full spectrum of defence tasks from peacetime evacuations to major conflicts.

As an interim measure should Super Hornets be acquired to meet the needs of the new fighter program they could be purchased with Growler wiring so that they could be converted to the Growler configuration in the future if Canada should wish to do so.

The addition of any of these non F-35  capabilities to the Canadian Armed Forces would not only greatly enhance the ability of the Defence establishment to deliver domestic security, they would increase the options available to any Canadian government when confronted with the need to support allies and engage in coalition warfare.




Justin Trudeau vows to scrap F-35 fighter jet program

Canada's F-35 Decision Poised To Shake Up Fighter Jet Market

Operation IMPACT

UAE Buys Saab’s Erieye AEW&C Aircraft

Raytheon Sentinel

Airbus CC-150 Polaris

A CSeries Jack of Many Military Roles – the Multi-Role Theatre Support Tanker/Transport

Big Liberal Win in Canada Is Bad News for the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter

EA-18G Growler



Wednesday, 23 January 2013

AIR TO AIR REFUELING MATTERS



James Hasik (1) has commented on the situation brought to light by KPMG's audit of the Joint Strike Fighter program (2) as reported by David Pugliese's article, in Defense News.(3)

In brief, it would appear that the F-35 to be acquired by the Canadian Forces will not be capable of “hose & drogue” air-to-air refueling and that as such will not be compatible with Canada’s current fleet of aerial tankers. (4)

"...According to Lockheed Martin, Canada has conducted a study to examine options for F-35 aerial refueling techniques. Lockheed Martin officials were not able to say what conclusions the Canadian study yielded.

Currently, the RCAF employs hose and drogue aerial refueling provided by CC-130H (T) and CC-150 aircraft. If the F-35A is adopted without any change, the Canadian way of aerial refueling would not be compatible. If one assumes Canada will retain its current aerial tanking technique, the options are to keep the current F-35A aerial refueling system and add the hose and drogue refueling piping.

The F-35A apparently has the space to accommodate this addition; however it would add weight to the aircraft, and would change the aircraft's center of gravity to some degree. We are unsure what implication the added weight and change in center of gravity would cause. Additionally, if the standard F-35A aerial refueling piping is retained, there would be maintenance required to keep that system functioning, even if it's not used.

If the standard F-35A aerial refueling piping is removed and only the hose and drogue piping installed, a change in the center of gravity would again need to be addressed and certified.

Regardless of any of these options, it is unknown what costs would be associated to such modifications of Canadian jets...." (5)

Hasik goes on to calculate all the permutations possible in this situation; buying new tankers, reconfiguring our current tankers, relying on our allies and various schemes for renting tanker time. He also points out that many countries do without dedicated air to air tankers. 

None of these seem like practical options. Canada needs an organic air-to-air refueling ability. It is not just a question of being able to support operations in our own, large, country. The truth is that support aircraft are of even more use in coalition actions then aircraft capable of “kinetic” effects. Anybody can show up at the party with a handful of fighter-bombers but it will be air refueling and ISR aircraft that make any actions possible.

To quote from the Department of National Defences’ web site (6) regarding Operation Mobile, our involvement in Libya;

“Operation Mobile has been a significant RCAF effort because we’ve been able to do it pretty much all ourselves,” said Maj. Kettles. “We used the CC-150 tankers to get our jets here.

“Our CC-150s and the CC-130 Hercules tankers, as well as other nations’, have fueled our CF-18s throughout the operation. The CP-140 Auroras have provided intelligence products favoured by NATO, while the CC-177 Globemaster III has been huge in delivering everything from aircraft parts to equipment, which has allowed us to sustain our operation.

“These capabilities have allowed us to have a huge impact within the coalition.”

It would be a serious mistake for Canada to overlook these lessons. When the F-35 was first contemplated it was seen in many ways as an F-16 replacement. (7) In that light it was assumed that a modification for hose and drogue refueling, as currently practiced by every Air Force in the world accept the U.S. Air Force, would be a simple matter. If it is not, if to have the F-35 Canada has to forgo an air-to-air refueling capability, then it is one more reason not to purchase the F-35 and one more reason to look for other ways for Canada to project power.



[1] The Canadian Aerial Refueling Question - 5 January 2013

[2] KPMG's audit of the Joint Strike Fighter program,” Other Potential Acquisition Cost”

[3] Canadian Military Would Need To Outsource F-35 Refueling

[5] Canadian F-35 Aerial Refueling Considerations (excerpt from 'Flying the F-35')

[6] CF-18 pilot flies 50th combat mission during Op Mobile

[7]  CANADIAN DEFENCE MATTERS, A SHORT HISTORY OF THE F-35